4.7 Article

Machine learning to predict properties of fresh and hardened alkali-activated concrete

期刊

CEMENT & CONCRETE COMPOSITES
卷 115, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2020.103863

关键词

Alkali-activated concrete; Slump flow; Compressive strength; Machine learning; Random forest

资金

  1. Leonard Wood Institute [LWI: W911NF-07-2-0062]
  2. Federal Highway Administration [693JJ31950021]
  3. National Science Foundation [NSF-CMMI: 1661609, NSF-CMMI: 1932690]
  4. Missouri Department of Transportation (MoDOT)
  5. Missouri Department of Natural Resources (MoDNR)
  6. Ameren Corporation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study introduces a random forest model to predict two important properties of fly ash-based AACs, providing high fidelity predictions of new AACs and quantitatively assessing the influence of physiochemical attributes and process parameters on AAC properties, offering a new pathway for optimization of AAC properties.
Alkali-activated concrete (AAC) is widely considered to be a sustainable alternative to Portland cement concrete. However, on account of extensive heterogeneity in composition of the aluminosilicates, coupled with the failure of classical materials science approaches to unravel the underlying composition-property linkages, reliable prediction of AAC's properties has remained infeasible. This paper presents a random forest (RF) model to predict two properties of fly ash-based AACs that are important from compliance standpoint - slump flow; and compressive strength - in relation to physiochemical attributes, curing conditions, and mixing procedures of the concretes. Results show that the RF model - once meticulously trained, and after its hyperparameters are rigorously optimized - is able to produce high fidelity predictions of both properties of new AACs. The model is also used to quantitatively assess the influence of physiochemical attributes and process parameters on the AAC's properties. Outcomes of this work present a pathway to optimization of AACs' properties.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据