4.7 Review

Revealing the hidden reality of the mammalian 12-h ultradian rhythms

期刊

CELLULAR AND MOLECULAR LIFE SCIENCES
卷 78, 期 7, 页码 3127-3140

出版社

SPRINGER BASEL AG
DOI: 10.1007/s00018-020-03730-5

关键词

12-h clock; Ultradian rhythm; XBP1s; Unfolded protein response; Circadian rhythm; ER stress

资金

  1. American Diabetes Association junior faculty development award [1-18-JDF-025]
  2. National Institute Of General Medical Sciences of the National Institutes of Health [DP2GM140924]
  3. National Institute of Diabetes And Digestive And Kidney Diseases of the National Institutes of Health [P30DK120531]
  4. National Institute of Health [T32AG021885]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Biological oscillations often cycle at different harmonics of the 24-hour circadian rhythms, but the 12-hour oscillation is also evolutionarily conserved and gaining attention. The 12-hour rhythms are mainly regulated by XBP1s, generating cycles of gene expression.
Biological oscillations often cycle at different harmonics of the 24-h circadian rhythms, a phenomenon we coined Musica Universalis in 2017. Like the circadian rhythm, the 12-h oscillation is also evolutionarily conserved, robust, and has recently gained new traction in the field of chronobiology. Originally thought to be regulated by the circadian clock and/or environmental cues, recent new evidences support the notion that the majority of 12-h rhythms are regulated by a distinct and cell-autonomous pacemaker that includes the unfolded protein response (UPR) transcription factor spliced form of XBP1 (XBP1s). 12-h cycle of XBP1s level in turn transcriptionally generates robust 12-h rhythms of gene expression enriched in the central dogma information flow (CEDIF) pathway. Given the regulatory and functional separation of the 12-h and circadian clocks, in this review, we will focus our attention on the mammalian 12-h pacemaker, and discuss our current understanding of its prevalence, evolutionary origin, regulation, and functional roles in both physiological and pathological processes.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据