4.8 Article

Hyocholic acid species improve glucose homeostasis through a distinct TGR5 and FXR signaling mechanism

期刊

CELL METABOLISM
卷 33, 期 4, 页码 791-+

出版社

CELL PRESS
DOI: 10.1016/j.cmet.2020.11.017

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [81974073, 81772530, 31972935, 91857115]
  2. National Key R&D Program of China [2019YFA0802300]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study reveals that high levels of hyocholic acid (HCA) in pigs contribute to their resistance against type 2 diabetes, as depletion of bile acids (BA) in pigs leads to reduced glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) secretion and increased blood glucose levels. HCA administration in diabetic mouse models effectively improves GLP-1 secretion and glucose homeostasis by activating TGR5 and inhibiting FXR in enteroendocrine cells, a mechanism not seen in other BA species. Clinical findings also show a correlation between lower levels of HCA species and diabetes, indicating its importance in glycemic control.
Hyocholic acid (HCA) and its derivatives are found in trace amounts in human blood but constitute approximately 76% of the bile acid (BA) pool in pigs, a species known for its exceptional resistance to type 2 diabetes. Here, we show that BA depletion in pigs suppressed secretion of glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) and increased blood glucose levels. HCA administration in diabetic mouse models improved serum fasting GLP-1 secretion and glucose homeostasis to a greater extent than tauroursodeoxycholic acid. HCA upregulated GLP-1 production and secretion in enteroendocrine cells via simultaneously activating G-protein-coupled BA receptor, TGR5, and inhibiting farnesoid X receptor (FXR), a unique mechanism that is not found in other BA species. We verified the findings in TGR5 knockout, intestinal FXR activation, and GLP-1 receptor inhibition mouse models. Finally, we confirmed in a clinical cohort, that lower serum concentrations of HCA species were associated with diabetes and closely related to glycemic markers.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据