4.7 Article

Plant roots employ cell-layer-specific programs to respond to pathogenic and beneficial microbes

期刊

CELL HOST & MICROBE
卷 29, 期 2, 页码 299-+

出版社

CELL PRESS
DOI: 10.1016/j.chom.2020.11.014

关键词

-

资金

  1. Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG) [DR273/15-1, DR273/15-2]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The research revealed that plant roots have genetically defined response programs in different cell layers when facing various microbial infections, highlighting the importance of radial organization in root-microbe interactions. The study utilized cell-layer translatomes to gain insights into the different colonization strategies of pathogens and mutualists, providing a valuable resource for crop improvement strategies.
Plant roots are built of concentric cell layers that are thought to respond to microbial infections by employing specific, genetically defined programs. Yet, the functional impact of this radial organization remains elusive, particularly due to the lack of genome-wide techniques for monitoring expression at a cell-layer resolution. Here, cell-type-specific expression of tagged ribosomes enabled the isolation of ribosome-bound mRNA to obtain cell-layer translatomes (TRAP-seq, translating ribosome affinity purification and RNA sequencing). After inoculation with the vascular pathogen Verticillium longisporum, pathogenic oomycete Phytophthora parasitica, or mutualistic endophyte Serendipita indica, root cell-layer responses reflected the fundamentally different colonization strategies of these microbes. Notably, V. longisporum specifically suppressed the endodermal barrier, which restricts fungal progression, allowing microbial access to the root central cylinder. Moreover, localized biosynthesis of antimicrobial compounds and ethylene differed in response to pathogens and mutualists. These examples highlight the power of this resource to gain insights into root-microbe interactions and to develop strategies in crop improvement.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据