4.8 Article

Differential encoding in prefrontal cortex projection neuron classes across cognitive tasks

期刊

CELL
卷 184, 期 2, 页码 489-+

出版社

CELL PRESS
DOI: 10.1016/j.cell.2020.11.046

关键词

-

资金

  1. NIMH [K01-MH114022]
  2. NIH [R01-NS050835]
  3. NSF NeuroNex grant

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Single-cell transcriptomics has been used to classify neurons in the mammalian brain, and in this study, researchers examined how specific transcriptomic types of mouse prefrontal cortex (PFC) projection neurons are related to axonal projections and encoding properties across multiple cognitive tasks. They found that most types of neurons projected to multiple targets, and that task signals are organized redundantly but with clear quantitative biases across cells of specific molecular-anatomical characteristics.
Single-cell transcriptomics has been widely applied to classify neurons in the mammalian brain, while systems neuroscience has historically analyzed the encoding properties of cortical neurons without considering cell types. Here we examine how specific transcriptomic types of mouse prefrontal cortex (PFC) projection neurons relate to axonal projections and encoding properties across multiple cognitive tasks. We found that most types projected to multiple targets, and most targets received projections from multiple types, except PFC -> PAG (periaqueductal gray). By comparing Ca (2+) activity of the molecularly homogeneous PFC -> PAG type against two heterogeneous classes in several two-alternative choice tasks in freely moving mice, we found that all task-related signals assayed were qualitatively present in all examined classes. However, PAG-projecting neurons most potently encoded choice in cued tasks, whereas contralateral PFC-projecting neurons most potently encoded reward context in an uncued task. Thus, task signals are organized redundantly, but with clear quantitative biases across cells of specific molecular-anatomical characteristics.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据