4.8 Article

3D printing of graphene oxide composites with well controlled alignment

期刊

CARBON
卷 171, 期 -, 页码 777-784

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.carbon.2020.08.077

关键词

PLA; GO; 3D printing; Nanofiller; Fiber; Nanocomposites

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [U1633201]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study introduces a universal strategy for large-scale alignment of graphene oxide without the need for modification. By laminating, scrolling, and 3D printing, graphene oxide nanosheets are aligned in the filament axial direction, resulting in improved mechanical properties of the composite materials.
As a super-anisotropic material, graphene possesses unprecedented strength, Young's modulus and electrical/thermal conductivity in its plane direction, while extremely weak properties along perpendicular direction. In order to fully take the advantage of graphene, its alignment in 3D polymer based structure is extremely important, yet still a daunting task. Here, we report a universal strategy of aligning graphene oxide (GO) in large scale without any modification of GO. This approach consists of laminating GO nanosheets with polymer (polylactic acid (PLA) for the demonstration) thin film, scrolling and then 3D printed by filament fused deposition technique. In printed filament, GO nanosheets are aligned in the filament axial direction, based on which GO orientation can be easily controlled via the path of filament fused deposition. We show that PLA/GO scrolled fibers and printed fibers with graphene content of 0.4 wt% exhibit outstanding mechanical properties with strength increase about 32.7% and 35.2%, respectively, which is significantly higher than similar nanocomposites with random graphene distribution, indicating much improved polymer reinforcement efficiency. The proposed scrolled fiber with 3D printing framework could be broadly applicable for various 2D materials and structural composites. (C) 2020 Published by Elsevier Ltd.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据