4.8 Article

Assessing the reliability of the Raman peak counting method for the characterization of SWCNT diameter distributions: a cross characterization with TEM

期刊

CARBON
卷 171, 期 -, 页码 968-979

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.carbon.2020.09.012

关键词

SWCNT; Raman; TEM; HRTEM; Metrology

资金

  1. French Research Funding Agency [ANR-13-BS10-0015, ANR-18-CE09-0014-04]
  2. European Union [604472]
  3. Fund for Scientific Research Flanders (FWO) [1512716N, G040011N, G021112N, G036618N]
  4. FWO Postdoc Fellowship [12ZP720N]
  5. European Research Council [679841]
  6. Agence Nationale de la Recherche (ANR) [ANR-18-CE09-0014, ANR-13-BS10-0015] Funding Source: Agence Nationale de la Recherche (ANR)
  7. European Research Council (ERC) [679841] Funding Source: European Research Council (ERC)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Resonant Raman spectroscopy is a widely used technique for characterizing single-walled carbon nanotubes, providing direct information on their structure. This study compared diameter distributions obtained through Raman peak counting with those from transmission electron microscopy, revealing differences due to chirality-dependence and the limited excitation wavelengths used. The effects of substrate and TEM-related biases were also discussed.
Resonant Raman spectroscopy is a widely used technique for single-walled carbon nanotube (SWCNT) characterization, in particular in the radial breathing mode (RBM) range which provides direct information on the structure of the nanotube in resonance. The RBM peak counting method, i.e. acquiring Raman spectrum grids on a substrate with a select set of discrete laser lines and counting RBM peaks as single nanotubes, is frequently used to characterize SWCNT growth samples, despite the many factors that can induce errors in the results. In this work, we cross-characterize the diameter distributions obtained through this methodology with diameter distributions obtained by counting SWCNT diameters in transmission electron microscopy (TEM) and discuss the different results and biases between the techniques. This study is performed on a broad diameter distribution sample, and on two chirality-enriched samples whose chirality distributions are determined by photoluminescence excitation spectroscopy (PLE) and statistical analysis of high resolution TEM (HRTEM) images. We show that the largest differences between the Raman peak counting and TEM diameter distributions stem from the chirality-dependence of SWCNT Raman cross-sections and the patchy vision offered by the use of only a few discrete excitation wavelengths. The effect of the substrate and TEM-related biases are also discussed. (C) 2020 Published by Elsevier Ltd.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据