4.7 Article

Redispersion and structural change evaluation of dried microfibrillated cellulose

期刊

CARBOHYDRATE POLYMERS
卷 252, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.carbpol.2020.117165

关键词

Cellulose nanofibers; Nanofibrils; Nanocellulose; Hornification; Crystallinity; Aggregates

资金

  1. Coordenacao de Aperfeicoamento de Pessoal de Nivel Superior - Brasil (CAPES) [001]
  2. Fundacao de Amparo a Pesquisa do Estado de Minas Gerais - FAPEMIG
  3. Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Cientifico e Tecnologico - CNPq
  4. Bioproducts Research Unit (BRU - ARS) at the United States Department of Agriculture (Albany - CA)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Commercializing dried microfibrillated cellulose (MFC) has been a challenge due to aggregation issues. This study found that drying/redispersion cycles at higher temperatures led to more severe aggregation, while milder action at room temperature once-drying maintained cellulose quality.
Commercializing dried microfibrillated cellulose (MFC) has always been a challenge mainly due to the tendency of MFC to aggregate. In this study MFC samples were submitted to drying/redispersion cycles at different temperatures. Morphology, crystallinity and mechanical performance of films were analyzed throughout the cycles. Microscopy images, particle size and stability in water showed that aggregation happens more severely with 5 drying/redispersion cycles and at drying temperatures of 75 and 100 degrees C. Particles once-dried at 20 degrees C formed the same size and web-like structure as the MFC-control. Crystallinity and crystallite sizes increased with drying/redispersion cycles especially when dried at 75 and 100 degrees C, however drying/redispersion cycles also led to a reduction in mechanical performance due to aggregation. While oven-drying is not the most suitable method, milder action at room temperature once-drying led to suspension stability in water, morphology and mechanical properties close to never-dried MFC, which makes this treatment a feasible option to maintain cellulose quality.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据