4.7 Article

Exosome-based detection of EGFR T790M in plasma and pleural fluid of prospectively enrolled non-small cell lung cancer patients after first-line tyrosine kinase inhibitor therapy

期刊

CANCER CELL INTERNATIONAL
卷 21, 期 1, 页码 -

出版社

BMC
DOI: 10.1186/s12935-021-01761-x

关键词

Liquid biopsy; Extracellular vesicles; Circulating tumor DNA; Non-small cell lung cancer; Epidermal growth factor receptor; Tyrosine kinase inhibitors

类别

资金

  1. AstraZeneca

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study demonstrates that exosomal nucleic acid has high specificity in detecting EGFR mutations, and combined TNA can be used to assess low-abundant EGFR mutant copies in NSCLC.
Background: The exosomal nucleic acid (exoNA) from the plasma and pleural fluid can potentially provide means to identify genomic changes in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients who develop resistance to targeted epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) inhibitor therapy. Methods: We compared the performance of the following tools to detect EGFR mutations in 54 plasma samples and 13 pleural fluid using cfDNA, combined TNA (exoTNA + cfTNA), or total cellular DNA: droplet digital PCR (ddPCR), the Cobas (R) EGFR Mutation Test v2 (Cobas) and NGS with Oncomine Pan-Cancer Cell-Free Assay. Results: All three of these platforms demonstrated 100% specificity in the detection of EGFR mutations in the plasma. In the detection of an activating mutation (exon 19 deletion and L858R), Cobas using cfDNA, ddPCR using combined TNA, and NGS using combined TNA showed a sensitivity of 93, 95.3, and 93.8%, respectively. For T790M mutation detection, the Cobas, ddPCR, and NGS showed a sensitivity of 64.7, 88.2, and 93.3%, respectively. Pleural fluid analysis revealed enrichment of the T790M mutant copies in the exosomes. ddPCR using exoTNA showed higher sensitivity than did total cellular DNA from the pleural fluid. Conclusion: These results demonstrated that combined TNA in the plasma and exoTNA in the pleural fluid can be used to evaluate low-abundant EGFR mutant copies in NSCLC.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据