4.7 Article

Expression profile of circular RNA and construction of circular RNA-Micro RNA network in salivary adenoid cystic carcinoma

期刊

CANCER CELL INTERNATIONAL
卷 21, 期 1, 页码 -

出版社

BMC
DOI: 10.1186/s12935-020-01681-2

关键词

Circular RNA; Salivary adenoid cystic carcinoma; microRNA; RNA sequencing; circRNA ABCA13

类别

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [81901049, 81772870]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study identified the profile of circRNA expression in SACC, with 5 up-regulated and 26 down-regulated circRNAs. The establishment of circRNA-miRNA system revealed an interaction between circRNA ABCA13 and cancer-related miRNA (miR-138-5p), suggesting circRNA ABCA13 may promote SACC through inhibition of miR-138-5p, providing a potential therapeutic target in SACC treatment.
BackgroundCircular RNAs (circRNAs) is a newly discovered type of non-coding RNA, the abnormal expression of which has been demonstrated in many types of human tumors. So they have been considered as promising candidates as diagnostic and therapeutic targets in cancer. This research aimed to screen the profile of circRNA expression in salivary adenoid cystic carcinoma (SACC).MethodsUsing the threshold of FDR<0.05 and fold change>2 or<0.5, 5 up-regulated and 26 down-regulated circRNAs were identified. The reliability of sequencing was verified by the expression detection of randomly selected circRNAs via qRT-PCR.ResultsMoreover, the circRNA-miRNA system was established by bioinformatics approaches and successfully identified an interaction between circRNA ABCA13 and a cancer-related miRNA (miR-138-5p), which was also verified by qRT-PCR. Moreover, the predicted molecular interaction proved that circRNA ABCA13 may promote SACC through inhibition of miR-138-5p.ConclusionsCollectively, this study has offered the first report about the circRNA expression profile and circRNA-miRNA network in SACC. All of the above could benefit the exploration of novel therapeutic target in SACC treatment.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据