4.8 Article

Senescence Reprogramming by TIMP1 Deficiency Promotes Prostate Cancer Metastasis

期刊

CANCER CELL
卷 39, 期 1, 页码 68-+

出版社

CELL PRESS
DOI: 10.1016/j.ccell.2020.10.012

关键词

-

资金

  1. ERC [683136]
  2. Swiss Cancer League grant [KFS4267-08-2017]
  3. Dr. Josef Steiner Foundation
  4. Swiss Card-Onco-Grant of Alfred and Annemarie von Sick grant
  5. Helmut Horten Foundation
  6. SNSF [310030_176045]
  7. PCUK [RIA15-ST2-018]
  8. IBSA Foundation
  9. Swiss National Science Foundation (SNF) [310030_176045] Funding Source: Swiss National Science Foundation (SNF)
  10. European Research Council (ERC) [683136] Funding Source: European Research Council (ERC)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Metastasis in prostate cancer is influenced by senescence with TIMP1 acting as a molecular switch. Elimination of senescent cells can impair tumor metastasis.
Metastases account for most cancer-related deaths, yet the mechanisms underlying metastatic spread remain poorly understood. Recent evidence demonstrates that senescent cells, while initially restricting tumorigenesis, can induce tumor progression. Here, we identify the metalloproteinase inhibitor TIMP1 as a molecular switch that determines the effects of senescence in prostate cancer. Senescence driven either by PTEN deficiency or chemotherapy limits the progression of prostate cancer in mice. TIMP1 deletion allows senescence to promote metastasis, and elimination of senescent cells with a senolytic BCL-2 inhibitor impairs metastasis. Mechanistically, TIMP1 loss reprograms the senescence-associated secretory phenotype (SASP) of senescent tumor cells through activation of matrix metalloproteinases (MMPs). Loss of PTEN and TIMP1 in prostate cancer is frequent and correlates with resistance to docetaxel and worst clinical outcomes in patients treated in an adjuvant setting. Altogether, these findings provide insights into the dual roles of tumor-associated senescence and can potentially impact the treatment of prostate cancer.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据