4.3 Article

Rural representation of the surveillance, epidemiology, and end results database

期刊

CANCER CAUSES & CONTROL
卷 32, 期 3, 页码 211-220

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s10552-020-01375-0

关键词

Rural; SEER; Travel time; Cancer

资金

  1. Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality - Cecil G. Sheps Center for Health Services Research, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill [5T32 HS000032]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

SEER data is widely used for studying cancer disparities in rural and urban areas but there is little research on how well rural areas covered by SEER represent the broader rural United States. Results show that rural SEER and non-SEER counties have similar demographics and cancer screening rates. However, patients in rural SEER regions have shorter travel times to cancer care facilities compared to those in rural non-SEER regions.
Purpose SEER data are widely used to study rural-urban disparities in cancer. However, no studies have directly assessed how well the rural areas covered by SEER represent the broader rural United States. Methods Public data sources were used to calculate county level measures of sociodemographics, health behaviors, health access and all cause cancer incidence. Driving time from each census tract to nearest Commission on Cancer certified facility was calculated and analyzed in rural SEER and non-SEER areas. Results Rural SEER and non-SEER counties were similar with respect to the distribution of age, race, sex, poverty, health behaviors, provider density, and cancer screening. Overall cancer incidence was similar in rural SEER vs non-SEER counties. However, incidence for White, Hispanic, and Asian patients was higher in rural SEER vs non-SEER counties. Unadjusted median travel time was 53 min (IQR 34-82) in rural SEER tracts and 54 min (IQR 35-82) in rural non-SEER census tracts. Linear modeling showed shorter travel times across all levels of rurality in SEER vs non-SEER census tracts when controlling for region (Large Rural: 13.4 min shorter in SEER areas 95% CI 9.1;17.6; Small Rural: 16.3 min shorter 95% CI 9.1;23.6; Isolated Rural: 15.7 min shorter 95% CI 9.9;21.6). Conclusions The rural population covered by SEER data is comparable to the rural population in non-SEER areas. However, patients in rural SEER regions have shorter travel times to care than rural patients in non-SEER regions. This needs to be considered when using SEER-Medicare to study access to cancer care.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据