4.7 Article

Expenditures among young adults with acute lymphoblastic leukemia by site of care

期刊

CANCER
卷 127, 期 11, 页码 1901-1911

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/cncr.33413

关键词

acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL); adolescent; adolescents and young adults; cost; expenditures; leukemia; National Cancer Institute-designated Comprehensive Cancer Center; spending; young adult

类别

资金

  1. Stand Up To Cancer Award [SU2C-AACR-SUPHOP01]
  2. ACS [MRSG-18-020-10-CPPB]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Young adults diagnosed with acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) between the ages of 22 and 39 have higher treatment expenditures at National Cancer Institute-designated Comprehensive Cancer Centers (CCC). Higher outpatient expenditures among CCC patients are primarily driven by outpatient hospital expenditures.
Background: Individuals diagnosed with acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) between the ages of 22 and 39 years experience worse outcomes than those diagnosed when they are 21 years old or younger. Treatment at National Cancer Institute-designated Comprehensive Cancer Centers (CCC) mitigates these disparities but may be associated with higher expenditures. Methods: Using deidentified administrative claims data (OptumLabs Data Warehouse), the cancer-related expenditures were examined among patients with ALL diagnosed between 2001 and 2014. Multivariable generalized linear model with log-link modeled average monthly health-plan-paid (HPP) expenditures and amount owed by the patient (out-of-pocket [OOP]). Cost ratios were used to calculate excess expenditures (CCC vs non-CCC). Incidence rate ratios (IRRs) compared CCC and non-CCC monthly visit rates. Models adjusted for sociodemographics, comorbidities, adverse events, and months enrolled. Results: Clinical and sociodemographic characteristics were comparable between CCC (n = 160) and non-CCC (n = 139) patients. Higher monthly outpatient expenditures in CCC patients ($15,792 vs $6404; P < .001) were driven by outpatient hospital HPP expenditures. Monthly visit rates and per visit expenditures for nonchemotherapy visits (IRR = 1.6; P = .001; CCC = $8247, non-CCC = $1191) drove higher outpatient hospital expenditures among CCCs. Monthly OOP expenditures were higher at CCCs for outpatient care (P = .02). Inpatient HPP expenditures were significantly higher at CCCs ($25,918 vs $13,881; beta = 0.9; P < .001) before accounting for adverse events but were no longer significant after adjusting for adverse events (beta = 0.4; P = .1). Hospitalizations and length of stay were comparable. Conclusions: Young adults with ALL at CCCs have higher expenditures, likely reflecting differences in facility structure, billing practices, and comprehensive patient care. It would be reasonable to consider CCCs comparable to the oncology care model and incentivize the framework to achieve superior outcomes and long-term cost savings. (c) 2021 American Cancer Society.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据