4.4 Article

CFD-DEM simulation of wall sheeting and particles charge in fluidized beds

期刊

CANADIAN JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL ENGINEERING
卷 99, 期 7, 页码 1582-1594

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/cjce.24007

关键词

agglomeration; CFD‐ DEM; electrostatic force; fluidized bed; wall sheeting

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study found that electrostatic charges in fluidized beds cause particle aggregation to form agglomerates, which in turn result in a layered structure on the wall surface. Compared to neutral beds, the accumulation of particles near the wall significantly increases in the presence of electrostatic charges.
The effect of the electrostatic charge of particles was investigated in fluidized beds with conductive and nonconductive walls. For this purpose, changes in the wall surface charge density and particle contact time near the wall were examined. Computational fluid dynamics/discrete element method (CFD-DEM) was utilized to simulate the accumulation of particle and wall-induced electrostatic charges in a quasi-two-dimensional fluidized bed. Particles and walls were initially considered neutral and gained charge with time. The simulations showed that aggregated particles are formed due to the presence of the opposite electrostatic charges. Agglomerates are produced by joining the aggregated particles together. Agglomerates have a layered-like structure and are made of positive and negative particles. Accumulation of these agglomerates and aggregated particles on the wall forms wall sheeting, which has a layered-like structure. In other words, particles do not accumulate on the wall individually. A significant accumulation of particles near the wall was seen in the presence of electrostatic charges compared with the neutral bed. Also, the contact time of particles on the wall in the conductive case was more prolonged than in the nonconductive case. The results indicate that the CFD-DEM approach is a helpful technique for predicting particles behaviour in the presence of the electrostatic charge.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据