4.4 Article

Use of an Integrated Geochemical and Ecotoxicological Approach to Evaluate Sediment Metal Contamination in Three Protected Estuarine Areas Along the Coast of Sao Paulo State, Brazil

期刊

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00128-020-03076-5

关键词

Sediment quality; Geochemical and toxicity analyses; Legally protected reserves; Differential metal contamination; Sã o Paulo state coast

资金

  1. Fundacao de Amparo a Pesquisa do Estado de Sao Paulo [2011/22537-0]
  2. Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Cientifico e Tecnologico, Brazil [300662/2009-2, 308649/2011]
  3. [2011/08065-9]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study compared sediment quality in estuaries at three locations along the coast of Sao Paulo State, Brazil, during two seasons of 2013. Results showed that sediments from the most protected locality had lower metal pollution and toxicity compared to those from less protected areas, which exhibited signs of environmental degradation.
We compared sediment quality in estuaries at three locations along the coast of Sao Paulo State, Brazil, using geochemical analyses and whole sediment toxicity tests, during the southern summer and winter of 2013. Each locality is afforded a distinct degree of legal protection, and exhibits a different level of metal pollution: overall, Rio Diana (RD, the most polluted, a Permanent Protection Area) > Rio Itapanhau (RI, intermediate contamination, an Environmental Protection Area) > Rio Picinguaba (RP, pristine, a State Park). Chronic sediment toxicity tests evaluated reproductive rates of the copepod Nitokra sp. RI sediments showed the highest metal concentrations and toxicity in both seasons. Metal concentrations at RD were low but toxic in summer. RP sediments were not contaminated, suggesting effective legal protection from pollution at this locality. RI and RD, although provided some legal protection, showed clear signs of environmental degradation, emphasizing the need for more effective pollution control.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据