4.6 Article

Improvement of engineering properties of expansive soil using liming leather waste ash

期刊

出版社

SPRINGER HEIDELBERG
DOI: 10.1007/s10064-020-02051-y

关键词

Expansive soil; Liming leather waste; UCS; CBR; Swell; XRD; SEM; EDX; CASH; Leachate modeling

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study investigates the use of liming leather waste ash (LLWA) as a sole expansive soil stabilizer, finding that it can substantially improve the strength and bearing characteristics of the soil while reducing its plasticity and swell-shrink behavior. The UCS and CBR values show significant increases post-curing, with UCS and soaked CBR escalating by 278% and 387% respectively. The microstructure study confirms the mineralogical transformation and cementation of soil particles.
The expansive soils have always presented various challenges for geotechnical and civil engineers due to their low bearing capacity and high swell-shrinkage characteristics. This study aims to utilize liming leather waste ash (LLWA) as a sole expansive soil stabilizer examining its effects on various engineering properties of soil such as consistency limits, compaction parameters, unconfined compressive strength (UCS), California bearing ratio (CBR), and swell parameters. The observations are also made on the curing effects on the strength parameters of the soil-additive mix. It was observed that the LLWA contains cementitious characteristics of lime and silica combined and can substantially reduce the plasticity and swell-shrink behavior of the soil and improve its strength and bearing characteristics. The UCS and CBR values have also shown multifold increase post curing with UCS and soaked CBR escalating by 278% and 387% respectively. The test results are further explained through the microstructure study which confirms the mineralogical transformation and cementation of soil particles. A one-dimensional rainfall-simulated leachate study has been carried out over a pavement model at the end to access the possible impact of ash treatment on the water table.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据