4.6 Article

Recommendations for determining the validity of consumer wearable and smartphone step count: expert statement and checklist of the INTERLIVE network

期刊

BRITISH JOURNAL OF SPORTS MEDICINE
卷 55, 期 14, 页码 780-793

出版社

BMJ PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1136/bjsports-2020-103147

关键词

accelerometer; physical activity; walking; validity; consensus statement

资金

  1. Portuguese Foundation for Science and Technology [SFRH/BPD/115977/2016]
  2. Science Foundation Ireland [12/RC/2289_P2]
  3. MINECO/FEDER [DEP2016-79512-R]
  4. University of Granada, Plan Propio de Investigacion 2016, Excellence actions: Units of Excellence
  5. Scientific Excellence Unit on Exercise and Health (UCEES)
  6. European Regional Development Funds [SOMM17/6107/UGR]
  7. Private Stiftung Ewald Marquardt fur Wissenschaft und Technik, Kunst und Kultur
  8. Research Council of Norway [249932/F20]
  9. European Research Council [716657]
  10. TrygFonden [310081]
  11. Huawei Technologies, Finland
  12. Junta de Andalucia, Consejeria de Conocimiento, Investigacion y Universidades

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Consumer wearable and smartphone devices provide an accessible means to objectively measure physical activity through step counts, but the validity of many of these devices has not been rigorously evaluated. The INTERLIVE consortium has developed a best-practice protocol for validating the accuracy of consumer wearables and smartphones, aiming to ensure methodological and reporting consistency while promoting safe use of this technology.
Consumer wearable and smartphone devices provide an accessible means to objectively measure physical activity (PA) through step counts. With the increasing proliferation of this technology, consumers, practitioners and researchers are interested in leveraging these devices as a means to track and facilitate PA behavioural change. However, while the acceptance of these devices is increasing, the validity of many consumer devices have not been rigorously and transparently evaluated. The Towards Intelligent Health and Well-Being Network of Physical Activity Assessment (INTERLIVE) is a joint European initiative of six universities and one industrial partner. The consortium was founded in 2019 and strives to develop best-practice recommendations for evaluating the validity of consumer wearables and smartphones. This expert statement presents a best-practice consumer wearable and smartphone step counter validation protocol. A two-step process was used to aggregate data and form a scientific foundation for the development of an optimal and feasible validation protocol: (1) a systematic literature review and (2) additional searches of the wider literature pertaining to factors that may introduce bias during the validation of these devices. The systematic literature review process identified 2897 potential articles, with 85 articles deemed eligible for the final dataset. From the synthesised data, we identified a set of six key domains to be considered during design and reporting of validation studies: target population, criterion measure, index measure, validation conditions, data processing and statistical analysis. Based on these six domains, a set of key variables of interest were identified and a 'basic' and 'advanced' multistage protocol for the validation of consumer wearable and smartphone step counters was developed. The INTERLIVE consortium recommends that the proposed protocol is used when considering the validation of any consumer wearable or smartphone step counter. Checklists have been provided to guide validation protocol development and reporting. The network also provide guidance for future research activities, highlighting the imminent need for the development of feasible alternative 'gold-standard' criterion measures for free-living validation. Adherence to these validation and reporting standards will help ensure methodological and reporting consistency, facilitating comparison between consumer devices. Ultimately, this will ensure that as these devices are integrated into standard medical care, consumers, practitioners, industry and researchers can use this technology safely and to its full potential.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据