4.6 Article

Recommendations for determining the validity of consumer wearable heart rate devices: expert statement and checklist of the INTERLIVE Network

期刊

BRITISH JOURNAL OF SPORTS MEDICINE
卷 55, 期 14, 页码 767-779

出版社

BMJ PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1136/bjsports-2020-103148

关键词

public health; consensus statement; sports medicine; sports and exercise medicine; cardiology

资金

  1. Private Stiftung Ewald Marquardt fur Wissenschaft und Technik, Kunst und Kultur
  2. Research Council of Norway [249932/F20]
  3. TrygFonden [310081]
  4. Portuguese Foundation for Science and Technology [SFRH/BPD/115977/2016]
  5. MINECO/FEDER [DEP2016-79512-R]
  6. University of Granada, Plan Propio de Investigacion 2016, Excellence actions: Units of Excellence
  7. Scientific Excellence Unit on Exercise and Health (UCEES)
  8. European Regional Development Funds [SOMM17/6107/UGR]
  9. Science Foundation Ireland [12/RC/2289_P2]
  10. European Research Council [716657]
  11. Huawei Technologies, Finland
  12. Junta de Andalucia, Consejeria de Conocimiento, Investigacion y Universidades

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This paper presents best-practice validation protocol for consumer wearables assessing heart rate by photoplethysmography (PPG), aiming to standardize the validity testing and reporting of PPG-based heart rate wearables used by consumers.
Assessing vital signs such as heart rate (HR) by wearable devices in a lifestyle-related environment provides widespread opportunities for public health related research and applications. Commonly, consumer wearable devices assessing HR are based on photoplethysmography (PPG), where HR is determined by absorption and reflection of emitted light by the blood. However, methodological differences and shortcomings in the validation process hamper the comparability of the validity of various wearable devices assessing HR. Towards Intelligent Health and Well-Being: Network of Physical Activity Assessment (INTERLIVE) is a joint European initiative of six universities and one industrial partner. The consortium was founded in 2019 and strives towards developing best-practice recommendations for evaluating the validity of consumer wearables and smartphones. This expert statement presents a best-practice validation protocol for consumer wearables assessing HR by PPG. The recommendations were developed through the following multi-stage process: (1) a systematic literature review based on the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses, (2) an unstructured review of the wider literature pertaining to factors that may introduce bias during the validation of these devices and (3) evidence-informed expert opinions of the INTERLIVE Network. A total of 44 articles were deemed eligible and retrieved through our systematic literature review. Based on these studies, a wider literature review and our evidence-informed expert opinions, we propose a validation framework with standardised recommendations using six domains: considerations for the target population, criterion measure, index measure, testing conditions, data processing and the statistical analysis. As such, this paper presents recommendations to standardise the validity testing and reporting of PPG-based HR wearables used by consumers. Moreover, checklists are provided to guide the validation protocol development and reporting. This will ensure that manufacturers, consumers, healthcare providers and researchers use wearables safely and to its full potential.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据