4.7 Article

Postoperative, but not preoperative, inflammation-based prognostic markers are prognostic factors in stage III colorectal cancer patients

期刊

BRITISH JOURNAL OF CANCER
卷 124, 期 5, 页码 933-941

出版社

SPRINGERNATURE
DOI: 10.1038/s41416-020-01189-6

关键词

-

类别

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study suggests that postoperative changes in inflammation-based prognostic markers are more accurate in predicting overall survival and recurrence-free survival in patients with stage III CRC. The study found that patients with a normalised inflammatory state had better prognosis compared to those with persistently elevated inflammatory state.
Background Recent evidence suggests that both preoperative and postoperative inflammation-based prognostic markers are useful for predicting the survival of colorectal cancer (CRC) patients. However, associations between longitudinal changes in inflammation-based prognostic markers and prognosis are controversial. Methods The subjects of this study were 568 patients with stage III CRC between 2008 and 2014. Preoperative and postoperative neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), lymphocyte-to-monocyte ratio (LMR), C-reactive protein/albumin ratio (CAR) and lymphocyte-to-C-reactive protein ratio (LCR) were calculated to assess the inflammatory state of subjects. Subjects were stratified into three groups for each marker: preoperatively low inflammatory state (normal group), preoperatively high but postoperatively low inflammatory state (normalised group) and persistently high inflammatory state (elevated group). Multivariable analyses for overall survival (OS) and recurrence-free survival (RFS) were performed to adjust for well-established clinicopathologic factors. Results For all assessed markers, the normalised group had a significantly better prognosis than the elevated group and a similar prognosis as the normal group for both OS and RFS. Conclusions Postoperative, but not preoperative, inflammation-based prognostic markers more accurately predict OS and RFS in patients with stage III CRC.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据