4.4 Article

Longitudinal changes in blood-based biomarkers in chronic moderate to severe traumatic brain injury: preliminary findings

期刊

BRAIN INJURY
卷 35, 期 3, 页码 285-291

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/02699052.2020.1858345

关键词

Traumatic brain injury; chronic disease; blood biomarkers; P-tau

资金

  1. Kenneth T. and Eileen L. Norris Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This longitudinal study found changes in P-tau levels over time in chronic TBI patients, which were positively related to functional outcomes and negatively related to the severity of depression. Additionally, P-tau and P-tau/T-tau ratio were positively correlated to shape changes in subcortical areas of the brain.
Objectives: This longitudinal study aims at 1) providing preliminary evidence of changes in blood-based biomarkers across time in chronic TBI and 2) relating these changes to outcome measures and cerebral structure and activity. Methods: Eight patients with moderate-to-severe TBI (7 males, 35 +/- 7.6 years old, 5 severe TBI, 17.52 +/- 3.84 months post-injury) were evaluated at monthly intervals across 6 time-points using: a) Blood-based biomarkers (GFAP, NSE, S100A12, SDBP145, UCH-L1, T-tau, P-tau, P-tau/T-tau ratio); b) Magnetic Resonance Imaging to evaluate changes in brain structure; c) Resting-state electroencephalograms to evaluate changes in brain function; and d) Outcome measures to assess cognition, emotion, and functional recovery (MOCA, RBANS, BDI-II, and DRS). Results: Changes in P-tau levels were found across time [p = .007]. P-tau was positively related to functional [p p = .006] outcomes, and negatively related to the severity of depression, 6 months later [R = -0.901; p =.006]. P-tau and P-tau/T-tau ratio were also positively correlated to shape change in subcortical areas such as brainstem [T(7) = 4.71, p = .008] and putamen [T(7) = 3.25, p = .012]. Conclusions: Our study provides preliminary findings that suggest a positive relationship between P-tau and the recovery of patients with chronic TBI.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据