4.2 Article

Monitoring environmental risk of the exotic species Kappaphycus alvarezii (Rhodophyta), after two decades of introduction in southeastern Brazil

期刊

BOTANICA MARINA
卷 63, 期 6, 页码 551-558

出版社

WALTER DE GRUYTER GMBH
DOI: 10.1515/bot-2020-0052

关键词

environmental impact; Eucheuma; eucheumoids; invasive species; mariculture

资金

  1. Coordination for the Improvement of Higher Education Personnel (CAPES) [001]
  2. National Council for Scientific and Technological Development (CNPq) [303937/2015-7, 304899/2017-8]
  3. BMBF [031B0284 (023/IVV-113816)]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Kappaphycus alvarezii was introduced for mariculture purposes on the coast of Sao Paulo, southeast of Brazil, in 1995, and since then an experimental pilot cultivation has been maintained. Since it is an exotic species, the dispersion of thallus fragments, presence of reproductive structures and recruitment from spores were monitored bimonthly from November 2016 to January 2018. Fragment dispersion was analyzed on nine selected monitoring sites around the cultivation raft through visual observation and photographic records. To verify the presence of reproductive structures 40 individuals were collected randomly from the cultivation raft and analyzed under a light microscope and stereomicroscope. Reproductive structure recruitment was also evaluated using artificial substrata. The results showed that even 25 years after the introduction of K. alvarezii on the coast of Sao Paulo, the invasive behavior of this exotic species had not been recorded. There was no evidence of vegetative dispersion and/or establishment in the Ubatuba Bay. Reproductive structures were also not found during the monitoring period. However, we highlight the importance of permanent and systematic environmental monitoring to prevent any impact and to ensure a sustainable aquaculture. These results will contribute to the development of the cultivation of the non-native K. alvarezii in Brazil and to improving public policies of coastal management.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据