4.5 Article

A retrospective cohort study on prevalence of postoperative complications in comminuted patellar fractures: comparisons among stabilized with Cannulated-Screw, Kirschner-Wire, or Ring-Pin Tension Bands

期刊

BMC MUSCULOSKELETAL DISORDERS
卷 22, 期 1, 页码 -

出版社

BMC
DOI: 10.1186/s12891-020-03936-5

关键词

Patellar fractures; Kirschner-wirecannulated-screw; Ring-pin; Tension band

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [81672144, 81974331]
  2. Shanghai Municipal Education Commission-Gaofeng Clinical Medicine Grant Support [20161429]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A retrospective cohort study involving 334 comminuted patellar fractures stabilized with tension band constructs compared the outcomes of using modified Kirschner-wire tension band, cannulated-screw tension band, or ring-pin tension band. The study found that the CSTB group had the highest fixation failure rate, while RPTB had the advantage of lower rates of symptomatic hardware removal compared to MKTB. Skin breakdown and infection rates did not significantly differ among the groups.
BackgroundDisplaced patellar fractures are commonly treated with open reduction and fixation with several different types of tension-band (TB) constructs. The main objective of this study was to compare the prevalence of postoperative complications after surgical stabilization of comminuted patellar fractures with either a modified Kirschner-wire tension band (MKTB), a cannulated-screw tension band (CSTB), or a ring-pin tension band (RPTB).MethodsWe conducted a retrospective and consecutive cohort study of comminuted patellar fractures (n=334) stabilized using a TB construct. Postoperative premature loss of reduction, infection, and skin breakdown were compared according to the type of TB constructs received (MKTB, CSTB, or RPTB). The rate of implant removal due to symptomatic hardware was also evaluated.ResultsFixation failure rate was significantly different among the groups (P=0.013), with failure rates of 4.7% observed in the MKTB group,14.5% in the CSTB group, and 4.9% in the RPTB group. Skin breakdown and infection were not significantly different among the groups (Ps>0.05). Due to symptomatic hardware, 40.5% of the patients in the MKTB group, 22.9% in the CSTB group, and 24.3% in the RPTB group underwent implant removal (P=0.004). After adjusting for age, gender, comorbidities, number of supplementary screws/K-wires, and use of cerclage cables, multivariate regression analysis revealed that CSTB contributed to a 2.08-times greater risk of fixation failure compared to RPTB, while MKTB and RPTB were similar in risk of failure. In addition, it was found that patients who underwent MKTB fixation were more than twice as likely to undergo implant removal for symptomatic hardware compared with RPTB (odds ratio=2.11, 95% CI=1.20 to 3.72; P=0.010).ConclusionsRPTB have advantage over MKTB and CSTB fixation in terms of symptomatic hardware and premature failure, respectively.Level of evidenceTherapeutic Level III

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据