4.5 Article

Spondylocarpotarsal synostosis syndrome due to a novel loss of function FLNB variant: a case report

期刊

BMC MUSCULOSKELETAL DISORDERS
卷 22, 期 1, 页码 -

出版社

BMC
DOI: 10.1186/s12891-020-03890-2

关键词

Carpal synostosis; Scoliosis; Exome sequencing; Pakistan; Case report

资金

  1. Higher Education Commission Pakistan
  2. University of the Punjab, Lahore

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Loss or gain of function variants in Filamin B (FLNB) can cause recessive or dominant skeletal disorders. Spondylocarpotarsal synostosis syndrome (SCT) is a rare autosomal recessive disorder characterized by short stature and bone fusion. A novel homozygous pathogenic variant in FLNB was identified in a family with skeletal malformations, short stature, and vertebral deformities. This report highlights the importance of assessing the heights of carriers of FLNB recessive variants in relation to idiopathic short stature.
BackgroundLoss of function or gain of function variants of Filamin B (FLNB) cause recessive or dominant skeletal disorders respectively. Spondylocarpotarsal synostosis syndrome (SCT) is a rare autosomal recessive disorder characterized by short stature, fused vertebrae and fusion of carpal and tarsal bones. We present a novel FLNB homozygous pathogenic variant and present a carrier of the variant with short height.Case presentationWe describe a family with five patients affected with skeletal malformations, short stature and vertebral deformities. Exome sequencing revealed a novel homozygous frameshift variant c.2911dupG p.(Ala971GlyfsTer122) in FLNB, segregating with the phenotype in the family. The variant was absent in public databases and 100 ethnically matched control chromosomes. One of the heterozygous carriers of the variant had short stature.ConclusionOur report expands the genetic spectrum of FLNB pathogenic variants. It also indicates a need to assess the heights of other carriers of FLNB recessive variants to explore a possible role in idiopathic short stature.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据