4.6 Article

Cost-effectiveness analysis of cabazitaxel for metastatic castration resistant prostate cancer after docetaxel and androgen-signaling-targeted inhibitor resistance

期刊

BMC CANCER
卷 21, 期 1, 页码 -

出版社

BMC
DOI: 10.1186/s12885-020-07754-9

关键词

Cabazitaxel; Abiraterone; Enzalutamide; Docetaxel; Cost-effectiveness; Prostate cancer

类别

资金

  1. National Natural and Scientific Foundation of China [81572988]
  2. Science & Technology Department of Sichuan Province Funding Project [2016FZ0108, 2018SZ0117]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

From the US payer's perspective, cabazitaxel may not be a cost-effective treatment option compared to androgen-signaling-targeted inhibitors for patients with mCRPC who had progression within 12 months while receiving ASTIs after docetaxel treatment.
BackgroundThe aim of our study was to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of cabazitaxel versus abiraterone or enzalutamide in patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) previously treated with docetaxel who had progression within 12months while receiving an alternative inhibitor (abiraterone or enzalutamide) from a US payer's perspective.MethodsTo conduct the cost-effectiveness analysis, a Markov decision model was established. Three health states (progression-free survival (PFS), progressive disease (PD) and death) were included, and the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) was regarded as the primary endpoint. The willingness-to-pay (WTP) threshold was set at $100,000.00/quality-adjusted life year (QALY), and discounted rates were set at 3% annually. Efficacy data were derived from the CARD trial and Weibull distribution curves were modeled to fit the survival curves. The robustness of the analysis was tested with a series of one-way sensitivity analyses and probabilistic sensitivity analyses.ResultsOverall, the incremental effectiveness and cost of cabazitaxel versus androgen-signaling-targeted inhibitors (ASTIs) were 0.16 QALYs and $49,487.03, respectively, which yielded an ICER of $309,293.94/QALY. Our model was mostly sensitive to the duration of PFS in the cabazitaxel group, cost of cabazitaxel and utility of the PFS state. At a WTP threshold of $100,000.00/QALY, cabazitaxel was the dominant strategy in 0% of the simulations.ConclusionsCabazitaxel is unlikely to be a cost-effective treatment option compared with ASTIs in patients with mCRPC previously treated with docetaxel who had progression within 12months while receiving ASTIs.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据