4.6 Article

Designing an exercise intervention for adult survivors of childhood cancers

期刊

BMC CANCER
卷 21, 期 1, 页码 -

出版社

BMC
DOI: 10.1186/s12885-020-07763-8

关键词

Cancer survivors; Child; adolescent cancers; Quality of life; Physical activity

类别

资金

  1. Roswell Park Cancer Institute
  2. National Cancer Institute (NCI) [3P30CA01605]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study examined the current physical activity levels and preferences of adult survivors of childhood cancers, finding that most participants were interested in participating in a structured exercise intervention, particularly enjoying walking, biking, and weight training. Common barriers included lack of time, health issues, and proximity to program locations.
Background This study examined current physical activity levels and preferences for exercise settings and activities among adult survivors of childhood cancers as a strategy to inform the feasibility and design of such programs. Methods A mixed-methods design was used to investigate current activity levels as well as barriers to and preferences for physical activity among 20 adult survivors of pediatric cancer. Results One-half of participants reported engaging in regular physical activity, although the frequency, intensity, and duration varied. Overall, 17 of the 20 participants (85%) stated they would be interested in participating in a structured exercise intervention, and they expressed a strong interest in walking (76%), bicycling (53%), and weight training (53%). Common barriers to participation in a potential structured exercise program were insufficient time, current health issues, and program location/distance. Nearly all participants agreed that information on nutrition and diet should be included as part of an exercise intervention. Conclusions These findings will help inform the design and implementation of future exercise programs to enhance physical activity among this high-risk group of cancer survivors.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据