4.7 Article

Cost effectiveness of caplacizumab in acquired thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura

期刊

BLOOD
卷 137, 期 7, 页码 969-976

出版社

AMER SOC HEMATOLOGY
DOI: 10.1182/blood.2020006052

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Institutes of Health National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases [5T32AI052074-13]
  2. National Institutes of Health National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute [1K08 HL136840]
  3. Luick Family Fund of Massachusetts General Hospital

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The addition of caplacizumab to standard of care in acquired TTP treatment is not cost-effective due to the high cost of the medication and lack of improvement in relapse rates. Further study on the long-term impact of caplacizumab on health system cost is warranted.
Acquired thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura (TTP) is a life-threatening disease characterized by thrombotic microangiopathy leading to end-organ damage. The standard of care (SOC) treatment is therapeutic plasma exchange (TPE) alongside immunomodulation with steroids, with increasing use of rituximab +/- other immunomodulatory agents. The addition of caplacizumab, a nanobody targeting von Willebrand factor, was shown to accelerate platelet count recovery and reduce TPE treatments and hospital length of stay in TTP patients treated in 2 major randomized clinical trials. The addition of caplacizumab to SOC also led to increased bleeding from transient reductions in von Willebrand factor and increased relapse rates. Using data from the 2 clinical trials of caplacizumab, we performed the first-ever cost-effectiveness analysis in TTP. Over a 5-year period, the projected incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) in our Markov model was $1 482 260, significantly above the accepted 2019 US willingness-to-pay threshold of $195 300. One-way sensitivity analyses showed the utility of the well state and the cost of caplacizumab to have the largest effects on ICER, with a reduction in caplacizumab cost demonstrating the single greatest impact on lowering the ICER. In a probabilistic sensitivity analysis, SOC was favored over caplacizumab in 100% of 10 000 iterations. Our data indicate that the addition of caplacizumab to SOC in treatment of acquired TTP is not cost effective because of the high cost of the medication and its failure to improve relapse rates. The potential impact of caplacizumab on health system cost using longer term follow-up data merits further study.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据