Obinutuzumab vs rituximab for advanced DLBCL: a PET-guided and randomized phase 3 study by LYSA

Rituximab plus p olychemotherapy is the standard of care in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL). GAINED, a randomized phase 3 trial, compared obinutuzumab to rituximab. Transplant-eligible patients (18-60 years) with an untreated age-adjusted International Prognostic Index (aaIPI) score >= 1 DLBCL were randomized (1:1) between obinutuzumab or rituximab and stratified by aaIPI (1; 2-3) and chemotherapy regimen (doxorubicin, cyclophosphamide, prednisone plus vindesine, bleomycin [ACVBP] or vincristine [CHOP]). Consolidation treatment was determined according to response to interim positron emission tomography (PET). Responders after cycle 2 and 4 (PET2(-)/PET4(-)) received immunoche-motherapy. Responders after only cycle 4 (PET2(-)/4(+)) received transplantation. The primary objective was an 8% improvement (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.73; 80% power; alpha risk, 2.5%; 1-sided) in 2-year event-free survival (EFS) in the obinutuzumab arm. From September 2012, 670 patientswere enrolled (obinutuzumab, n5336; rituximab, n5334). A total of 383 (57.2%) were aaIPI 2-3, 339 (50.6%) received CHOP. Median follow-up was 38.7 months. The 2-year EFS was similar in both groups (59.8% vs 56.6%; P =.123; HR 5 0.88). The 2-year PFS in the whole cohort was 83.1% ( 95% confidence interval, 80% to 85.8%). PET2(-)/4(-) and PET2(+)/4(-) had similar 2-year progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS): 89.9% vs 83.9% and 94.8% vs 92.8%. The 2-year PFS and OS for PET4(+) patients were 62% and 83.1%. Grade 3-5 infections were more frequent in the obinutuzumab arm (21% vs 12%). Obinutuzumab is not superior to rituximab in aaIPI >= 1 DLBCL transplant-eligible patients.

Automated summary

For transplant-eligible patients with untreated diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) and an age-adjusted International Prognostic Index (aaIPI) score >= 1, obinutuzumab is not superior to rituximab.