相关参考文献
注意:仅列出部分参考文献,下载原文获取全部文献信息。Predicting Gleason Group Progression for Men on Prostate Cancer Active Surveillance: Role of a Negative Confirmatory Magnetic Resonance Imaging-Ultrasound Fusion Biopsy
Jonathan B. Bloom et al.
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY (2019)
MRI in active surveillance: a critical review
Vasilis Stavrinides et al.
PROSTATE CANCER AND PROSTATIC DISEASES (2019)
Use of multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging in prostate cancer active surveillance
Allison S. Glass et al.
BJU INTERNATIONAL (2019)
Resisting recommended treatment for prostate cancer: a qualitative analysis of the lived experience of possible overdiagnosis
Kirsten McCaffery et al.
BMJ OPEN (2019)
Predicting Biopsy Outcomes During Active Surveillance for Prostate Cancer: External Validation of the Canary Prostate Active Surveillance Study Risk Calculators in Five Large Active Surveillance Cohorts
Frank Jan H. Drost et al.
EUROPEAN UROLOGY (2019)
Does the introduction of prostate multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging into the active surveillance protocol for localized prostate cancer improve patient re-classification?
Richard J. Bryant et al.
BJU INTERNATIONAL (2018)
Role of Surveillance Biopsy with No Cancer as a Prognostic Marker for Reclassification: Results from the Canary Prostate Active Surveillance Study
James T. Kearns et al.
EUROPEAN UROLOGY (2018)
Refined Analysis of Prostate-specific Antigen Kinetics to Predict Prostate Cancer Active Surveillance Outcomes
Matthew R. Cooperberg et al.
EUROPEAN UROLOGY (2018)
Clinically Localized Prostate Cancer: AUA/ASTRO/SUO Guideline. Part I: Risk Stratification, Shared Decision Making, and Care Options
Martin G. Sanda et al.
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY (2018)
Active surveillance for prostate cancer: a systematic review of contemporary worldwide practices
Netty Kinsella et al.
TRANSLATIONAL ANDROLOGY AND UROLOGY (2018)
Can active surveillance really reduce the harms of overdiagnosing prostate cancer? A reflection of real life clinical practice in the PRIAS study
Frank-Jan H. Drost et al.
TRANSLATIONAL ANDROLOGY AND UROLOGY (2018)
Qualitative study on decision-making by prostate cancer physicians during active surveillance
Stacy Loeb et al.
BJU INTERNATIONAL (2017)
Complications After Systematic, Random, and Image-guided Prostate Biopsy
Marco Borghesi et al.
EUROPEAN UROLOGY (2017)
Prognostic Significance of a Negative Prostate Biopsy: An Analysis of Subjects Enrolled in a Prostate Cancer Screening Trial
Patrick Lewicki et al.
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY (2017)
When is a Negative Prostate Biopsy Really Negative? Repeat Biopsies in Detection and Active Surveillance
Stacy Loeb
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY (2017)
Diagnostic accuracy of multi-parametric MRI and TRUS biopsy in prostate cancer (PROMIS): a paired validating confirmatory study
Hashim U. Ahmed et al.
LANCET (2017)
Prognostic Significance of a Negative Confirmatory Biopsy on Reclassification Among Men on Active Surveillance
Vishnu Ganesan et al.
UROLOGY (2017)
Active Surveillance for Low-Risk Prostate Cancer-An Evolving International Standard of Care
Matthew R. Cooperberg
JAMA ONCOLOGY (2017)
A retrospective comparison between transrectal and transperineal prostate biopsy in the detection of prostate cancer
Carmelo Agostino Di Franco et al.
ARCHIVIO ITALIANO DI UROLOGIA E ANDROLOGIA (2017)
A Decade of Active Surveillance in the PRIAS Study: An Update and Evaluation of the Criteria Used to Recommend a Switch to Active Treatment
Leonard P. Bokhorst et al.
EUROPEAN UROLOGY (2016)
Prostate Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Magnetic Resonance Imaging Targeted Biopsy in Patients with a Prior Negative Biopsy: A Consensus Statement by AUA and SAR
Andrew B. Rosenkrantz et al.
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY (2016)
Compliance Rates with the Prostate Cancer Research International Active Surveillance (PRIAS) Protocol and Disease Reclassification in Noncompliers
Leonard P. Bokhorst et al.
EUROPEAN UROLOGY (2015)
Magnetic Resonance Imaging-targeted Biopsy May Enhance the Diagnostic Accuracy of Significant Prostate Cancer Detection Compared to Standard Transrectal Ultrasound-guided Biopsy: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
Ivo G. Schoots et al.
EUROPEAN UROLOGY (2015)
Predictors of Pathologic Progression on Biopsy Among Men on Active Surveillance for Localized Prostate Cancer: The Value of the Pattern of Surveillance Biopsies
K. Clint Cary et al.
EUROPEAN UROLOGY (2014)
A Negative Confirmatory Biopsy Among Men on Active Surveillance for Prostate Cancer Does Not Protect Them from Histologic Grade Progression
Lih-Ming Wong et al.
EUROPEAN UROLOGY (2014)
Multiparametric MRI followed by targeted prostate biopsy for men with suspected prostate cancer: a clinical decision analysis
Sarah R. Willis et al.
BMJ OPEN (2014)
The role of MRI in active surveillance of prostate cancer
Caroline M. Moore et al.
CURRENT OPINION IN UROLOGY (2013)
Patient Perspective on Watchful Waiting/Active Surveillance for Localized Prostate Cancer
Jinping Xu et al.
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN BOARD OF FAMILY MEDICINE (2012)
Risk Factors for Prostate Cancer Detection After a Negative Biopsy: A Novel Multivariable Longitudinal Approach
Peter H. Gann et al.
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY (2010)