4.4 Article

Investigating neural circuits of emotion regulation to distinguish euthymic patients with bipolar disorder and major depressive disorder

期刊

BIPOLAR DISORDERS
卷 23, 期 3, 页码 284-294

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/bdi.13042

关键词

amygdala; emotion regulation; fMRI; mood disorders; reappraisal; subgenual anterior cingulate cortex

资金

  1. National Health and Medical Research Council (NHMRC) of Australia [APP1087560]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study found that euthymic bipolar disorder (BD) and major depressive disorder (MDD) patients engage different brain regions to process and regulate emotional information. These differences could help distinguish the clinical groups and provide new insights into the underlying pathophysiology of BD.
Background: Up to 40% of patients with bipolar disorder (BD) are initially diagnosed as having major depressive disorder (MDD), and emotional lability is a key aspect of both sets of mood disorders. However, it remains unknown whether differences in the regulation of emotions through cognitive reappraisal may serve to distinguish BD and MDD. Therefore, we examined this question in euthymic BD and MDD patients. Methods: Thirty-eight euthymic BD, 33 euthymic MDD and 37 healthy control (HC) participants, matched for age, gender and depression severity, engaged in an emotion regulation (ER) cognitive reappraisal task during an fMRI scan were examined. Participants either reappraised (Think condition) or passively watched negative (Watch condition) or neutral (Neutral condition) pictures and rated their affect. Activation and connectivity analyses were used to examine group differences in reappraisal (Think vs Watch) and reactivity (Watch vs Neutral) conditions in ER-specific neural circuits. Results: Irrespective of group, participants rated most negatively the images during the Watch condition relative to Think and Neutral conditions, and more negatively to Think relative to Neutral. Notably, BD participants exhibited reduced subgenual anterior cingulate activation (sgACC) relative to MDD during reappraisal, but exhibited greater sgACC activation relative to MDD during reactivity, whereas MDD participants elicited greater activation in right amygdala relative to BD during reactivity. We found no group differences in task-related connectivity. Conclusions: Euthymic BD and MDD patients engage differential brain regions to process and regulate emotional information. These differences could serve to distinguish the clinical groups and provide novel insights into the underlying pathophysiology of BD.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据