4.6 Review

Microfluidics for microalgal biotechnology

期刊

BIOTECHNOLOGY AND BIOENGINEERING
卷 118, 期 4, 页码 1545-1563

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/bit.27669

关键词

biochemicals; biofuels; biosensing; cell harvesting; cell sorting; microalgae; microfluidics

资金

  1. Alexander von Humboldt-Stiftung
  2. Marie Sklodowska-Curie Individual Fellowship award [101003361]
  3. Royal Academy Newton-Katip Celebi Transforming Systems Through Partnership Award [120N019]
  4. TUBITAK 2232 International Fellowship for Outstanding Researchers Award [118C391]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Microalgae have diversified applications in biofuels, biosensing, and other biotechnological products, but advanced technologies are needed to optimize the production processes.
Microalgae have expanded their roles as renewable and sustainable feedstocks for biofuel, smart nutrition, biopharmaceutical, cosmeceutical, biosensing, and space technologies. They accumulate valuable biochemical compounds from protein, carbohydrate, and lipid groups, including pigments and carotenoids. Microalgal biomass, which can be adopted for multivalorization under biorefinery settings, allows not only the production of various biofuels but also other value-added biotechnological products. However, state-of-the-art technologies are required to optimize yield, quality, and the economical aspects of both upstream and downstream processes. As such, the need to use microfluidic-based devices for both fundamental research and industrial applications of microalgae, arises due to their microscale sizes and dilute cultures. Microfluidics-based devices are superior to their competitors through their ability to perform multiple functions such as sorting and analyzing small amounts of samples (nanoliter to picoliter) with higher sensitivities. Here, we review emerging applications of microfluidic technologies on microalgal processes in cell sorting, cultivation, harvesting, and applications in biofuels, biosensing, drug delivery, and nutrition.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据