4.8 Article

Direct plasmonic detection of circulating RAS mutated DNA in colorectal cancer patients

期刊

BIOSENSORS & BIOELECTRONICS
卷 170, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY
DOI: 10.1016/j.bios.2020.112648

关键词

Plasmonics; Gold nanoparticles; Liquid biopsy; Colorectal cancer; RAS mutations

资金

  1. European Union [633937]
  2. Associazione Italiana per la Ricerca sul Cancro (AIRC) [19503, 19052]
  3. 'Departments of Excellence' program of the Italian Ministry for Education, University and Research (MIUR, 2018-2022)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

RAS mutations in the blood of colorectal cancer (CRC) patients are emerging as biomarkers of acquired resistance to Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor therapy. Unfortunately, reliable assays granting fast, real-time monitoring of treatment response, capable of refining retrospective, tissue-based analysis, are still needed. Recently, several methods for detecting blood RAS mutations have been proposed, generally relying on multi-step and PCR-based, time-consuming and cost-ineffective procedures. By exploiting a liquid biopsy approach, we developed an ultrasensitive nanoparticle-enhanced plasmonic method for detecting similar to 1 aM RAS single nucleotide variants (SNVs) in the plasma of CRC patients. The assay does not require the extraction of tumor DNA from plasma and detects it in volumes as low as 40 mu L of plasma, which is at least an order of magnitude smaller than that required by state of the art liquid biopsy technologies. The most prevalent RAS mutations are detected in DNA from tumor tissue with 100% sensitivity and 83.33% specificity. Spike-in experiments in human plasma further encouraged assay application on clinical specimens. The assay was proven in plasma from CRC patients and healthy donors, and full discrimination between mutated DNA from patients over wild-type DNA from healthy volunteers was obtained thus demonstrating its promising avenue for cancer monitoring based on liquid biopsy.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据