4.7 Article

Mesophication of Oak Landscapes: Evidence, Knowledge Gaps, and Future Research

期刊

BIOSCIENCE
卷 71, 期 5, 页码 531-542

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/biosci/biaa169

关键词

fire-adapted traits; flammability; mesophytic; prescribed fire; pyrophytic

类别

资金

  1. National Institution of Food and Agriculture, US Department of Agriculture [MISZ-069450, MISZ-399080, MISZ-069390, PEN-04685]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Pyrophytic oak landscapes in the central and eastern United States are losing dominance due to the encroachment of shade-tolerant, fire-sensitive, or opportunistic tree species in the absence of periodic, low-intensity surface fires. Mesophication, a hypothesized process initiated by intentional fire exclusion, is commonly cited as causing this transition, but many questions remain about its role in declining oak dominance.
Pyrophytic oak landscapes across the central and eastern United States are losing dominance as shade-tolerant, fire-sensitive, or opportunistic tree species encroach into these ecosystems in the absence of periodic, low-intensity surface fires. Mesophication, a hypothesized process initiated by intentional fire exclusion by which these encroaching species progressively create conditions favorable for their own persistence at the expense of pyrophytic species, is commonly cited as causing this structural and compositional transition. However, many questions remain regarding mesophication and its role in declining oak dominance. In the present article, we review support and key knowledge gaps for the mesophication hypothesis. We then pose avenues for future research that consider which tree species and tree traits create self-perpetuating conditions and under what conditions tree-level processes might affect forest flammability at broader scales. Our goal is to promote research that can better inform restoration and conservation of oak ecosystems experiencing structural and compositional shifts across the region.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据