4.8 Article

Ammonia-induced inhibition of manure-based continuous biomethanation process under different organic loading rates and associated microbial community dynamics

期刊

BIORESOURCE TECHNOLOGY
卷 320, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.biortech.2020.124323

关键词

Anaerobic digestion; Ammonia inhibition; OLR; Microbial community

资金

  1. European Regional Development Fund of the European Union
  2. Greek national funds through the Operational Program Competitiveness, Entrepreneurship and Innovation, under the call RESEARCH -CREATE - INNOVATE [T1EDK-00406]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this study, the operation of three CTSRs under different OLR conditions revealed that increasing the OLR to raise the C/N ratio can intensify the inhibition of anaerobic processes, especially under high ammonia concentration. Different responses of bacterial and archaeal communities were observed under ammonia stress conditions. Additionally, the dominant methanogenesis route varied depending on the OLR and ammonia concentration.
Three Continuously Stirred Tank Reactors (CTSRs) were operating at steady state conditions with Organic Loading Rates (OLR) of 2.09, 3.024 and 4.0 g VS L-1 d(-1). Glucose was used as the sole factor for increasing the OLR, linking the increase of the OLR with the C/N ratio increase. The reactors were stressed by increasing the ammonia concentration to 5 g L (1) from 1.862 g L (1). The results showed elevating inhibition of the anaerobic process by increasing the C/N ratio just by increasing the OLR, under the high ammonia concentration. A different response of the bacterial and archaeal community under ammonia stressed conditions was also observed. Under the high ammonia concentration, hydrogen-depended methylotrophic was the dominant methanogenesis route at OLR of 2.09 g VS L(-1)d(-1), while the hydrogenotrophic route was the dominant at the high OLR of 4 g VS L(-1)d(-1), which coincided with high acetate and propionate concentrations.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据