4.8 Article

Screening of the dominant Chlorella pyrenoidosa for biofilm attached culture and feed production while treating swine wastewater

期刊

BIORESOURCE TECHNOLOGY
卷 318, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.biortech.2020.124054

关键词

Chlorella pyrenoidosa; Biofilm attached culture; Anaerobically digested swine wastewater; Nutritional components; Essential amino acid; Feed addition

资金

  1. Natural Science Foundation of Zhejiang Province [LY20D060003]
  2. Open Fund of Key Laboratory of Experimental Marine Biology, Chinese Academy of Sciences [KF2019NO3]
  3. International Postdoctoral Exchange Fellowship Program [20180042]
  4. China Postdoctoral Science Foundation [2017T100583]
  5. Ningbo Municipal Science and Technology Project [2019C10071]
  6. Ningbo Municipal Natural Science Foundation [431901822]
  7. Key Laboratory of Poyang Lake Ecological Environment and Resource Development [PK2017001]
  8. University of Minnesota Center for Biorefining

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This research 12 microalgal species were screened for biofilm attached culture in the treatment of anaerobically digested swine wastewater (ADSW). The influence of ADSW on biomass productivity and removal efficiencies were evaluated using biofilm attached culture with the selected Chlorella pyrenoidosa. The variation of nutritional components from algal cells were further analysed to evaluate the potential applications of C. pyrenoidosa. The results showed that C. pyrenoidosa had the highest tolerance to ADSW, and the highest removal efficiencies for wastewater pollutants were reached when cultured in 5 times diluted ADSW. These test conditions resulted in an algal cell biomass composed of 57.30% proteins, 14.87% extracellular polysaccharide, 3.08% crude fibre, 5.57% crude ash, 2.85% moisture. Amino acids in proteins contained 21.73% essential amino acids and the EAA/NEAA value was 0.64. The essential amino acid score indicates that the selected C. pyrenoidosa could be a good protein source for feed addition.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据