4.7 Article

Design, synthesis, and biological evaluation of novel imidazole derivatives possessing terminal sulphonamides as potential BRAFV600E inhibitors

期刊

BIOORGANIC CHEMISTRY
卷 106, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.bioorg.2020.104508

关键词

Protein kinase inhibitors; BRAF(V600E) inhibitors; Anticancer; Imidazole; SAR

资金

  1. Korea Institute of Science and Technology (KIST)
  2. KIST Project [2E29340]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study developed and synthesized a series of compounds with anticancer potential, demonstrating promising activity in various cancer types. Two compounds showed notable anti-cancer effects on Melanoma cancer cell lines.
BRAF(V600E) mutation has been detected in various malignant tumours. Developing of potent BRAF(V600E) inhibitors is considered a leading step in the way to cure different cancer types. In the current work, a series of 38 4-(1Himidazol-5-yl)pyridin-2-amine derivatives was designed and synthesized using Dabrafenib as a lead compound for structural-guided optimization. The target compounds were evaluated as potential anticancer agents against NCI 60 human cancer cell lines. In 5-dose testing mode, two compounds 14h and 16e were tested to determine their IC50 values over each of the 60 cell lines. The selected candidates exhibited promising activity with mean IC(50 )values of 2.4 mu M and 3.6 mu M, respectively. Melanoma cancer cell lines exhibited the highest sensitivity after the treatment with the tested compounds 14h and 16e. The mean IC50 values of compounds 14h and 16e against Melanoma cancer cell lines are 1.8 mu M and 1.88 mu M, respectively. In addition, BRAF v600E kinase inhibitory activity was determined for each derivative. Compounds 15i, 15j, 16a, and 16d were the most potent inhibitors against BRAF(V600E)with IC50 76 nM, 32 nM, 35 nM, and 68 nM. The newly developed compounds represent a therapeutically promising approach for the treating various cancer types.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据