4.7 Review

Sex Differences in Neurodegeneration: The Role of the Immune System in Humans

期刊

BIOLOGICAL PSYCHIATRY
卷 91, 期 1, 页码 72-80

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.biopsych.2021.01.002

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Institutes of Health [1R01AG054214-01A1, U54NS100717, R01AG051390, T32GM007618]
  2. Tau Consortium
  3. JPB Foundation
  4. National Institute of Aging [F30 AG062043-02]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Growing evidence suggests that immune dysfunction plays a significant role in the etiology of neurodegenerative diseases, many of which exhibit notable sex differences. Understanding sex-specific immune activity in the central nervous system can help explain downstream sex differences in diseases like multiple sclerosis, Alzheimer's disease, Parkinson's disease, and amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Recognizing and studying these sex differences is important for improving clinical and translational research efforts, and further analyses may uncover novel disease mechanisms for better treatment outcomes in both sexes.
Growing evidence supports significant involvement of immune dysfunction in the etiology of neurodegenerative diseases, several of which also display prominent sex differences across prevalence, pathology, and symptomology. In this review, we summarize evidence from human studies of established and recent findings of sex differences in multiple sclerosis, Alzheimer's disease, Parkinson's disease, and amyotrophic lateral sclerosis and discuss how sex specific central nervous system innate immune activity could contribute to downstream sex differences in these diseases. We examine human genomic and transcriptomics studies in each neurodegenerative disease through the lens of sex differences in the neuroimmune system and highlight the importance of stratifying sex in clinical and translational research studies. Finally, we discuss the limitations of the existing studies and outline recommendations for further advancing sex-based analyses to uncover novel disease mechanisms that could ultimately help treat both sexes.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据