4.7 Article

Probabilistic framework for integration of mass spectrum and retention time information in small molecule identification

期刊

BIOINFORMATICS
卷 37, 期 12, 页码 1724-1731

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btaa998

关键词

-

资金

  1. Academy of Finland [310107]
  2. Aalto Science-IT infrastructure
  3. Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council [EP/R018634/1]
  4. Scottish Informatics and Computing Science Alliance (SICSA)
  5. EPSRC [EP/R018634/1] Funding Source: UKRI
  6. Academy of Finland (AKA) [310107, 310107] Funding Source: Academy of Finland (AKA)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this study, a probabilistic modeling framework was proposed to integrate MS and RT data in LC-MS experiments. By combining MS2 data and retention orders, the proposed approach showed improved identification accuracy, outperforming state-of-the-art methods.
Motivation: Identification of small molecules in a biological sample remains a major bottleneck in molecular biology, despite a decade of rapid development of computational approaches for predicting molecular structures using mass spectrometry (MS) data. Recently, there has been increasing interest in utilizing other information sources, such as liquid chromatography (LC) retention time (RT), to improve identifications solely based on MS information, such as precursor mass-per-charge and tandem mass spectrometry (MS2). Results: We put forward a probabilistic modelling framework to integrate MS and RT data of multiple features in an LC-MS experiment. We model the MS measurements and all pairwise retention order information as a Markov random field and use efficient approximate inference for scoring and ranking potential molecular structures. Our experiments show improved identification accuracy by combining MS2 data and retention orders using our approach, thereby outperforming state-of-the-art methods. Furthermore, we demonstrate the benefit of our model when only a subset of LC-MS features has MS2 measurements available besides MS1.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据