4.3 Article

Amplified LncRNA PVT1 promotes lung cancer proliferation and metastasis by facilitating VEGFC expression

期刊

BIOCHEMISTRY AND CELL BIOLOGY
卷 98, 期 6, 页码 676-682

出版社

CANADIAN SCIENCE PUBLISHING
DOI: 10.1139/bcb-2019-0435

关键词

lncRNA; PVT1; miR-128; lung cancer; VEGFC

资金

  1. Heilongjiang Provincial Natural Science Foundation of China [LH2019H121]
  2. University Nursing Program for Young Scholars with Creative Talents in Heilongjiang Province [UNPYSCT-2016113]
  3. National Science Foundation of China [82072752, 81772498]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Although the abundance of long non-coding RNA (lncRNA) plasmacytoma variant translocation 1 (PVT1) in lung cancer has been well researched, the underlying mechanisms behind its effects were unknown. Here we investigated the molecular events regulating PVT1 in lung cancer. The pro-proliferative property of PVT1 was examined using a xenograft tumor model. Transwell chambers were used to analyze the impact of PVT1 expression on cell invasiveness and migration. In vivo metastasis was examined by tail-vein-injection in mice. Direct binding of miR-128 to PVT1 was investigated using a probe pulldown assay. The relative expression levels of miR-128 and PVT1 were quantified by real-time polymerase chain reaction and Western blotting. We show here that when PVT1 is amplified, there is a poor survival prognosis for patients with lung cancer. Elevated levels of PVT1 promoted lung cancer cell proliferation and metastasis, both in vitro and in vivo. Mechanistically, we found that PVT1 competes endogenously with miR-128 in the regulation of vascular endothelial growth factor C (VEGFC) expression, which is significantly associated with an unfavorable prognosis in lung cancer. We identified that copy number amplification significantly contributes to the high level of PVT1 transcripts in lung cancer, which promotes cell proliferation and metastatic behavior via modulating VEGFC expression by endogenous competition with miR-128.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据