4.7 Article

Role of nitric oxide in the response to photooxidative stress in prostate cancer cells

期刊

BIOCHEMICAL PHARMACOLOGY
卷 182, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.bcp.2020.114205

关键词

Prostate cancer cells; Photooxidative stress; Nitric oxide; NF-kappa B pathway; Nrf2 pathway; RKIP expression

资金

  1. AIRC Associazione Italiana per la Ricerca sul Cancro, IG 2017, The National FFABR, VQ3 DAME [19898]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A continuous state of oxidative stress during inflammation contributes to the development of 25% of human cancers. Epithelial and inflammatory cells release reactive oxygen species (ROS) and reactive nitrogen species (RNS) that can damage DNA. ROS/RNS have biological implications in both chemoresistance and tumor recurrence. As several clinically employed anticancer drugs can generate ROS/RNS, we have addressed herein how inducible nitric oxide synthase and nitric oxide (iNOS/(NO)-N-center dot) affect the molecular pathways implicated in the tumor response to oxidative stress. To mimic the oxidative stress associated with chemotherapy, we used a photosensitizer (pheophorbide a) that can generate ROS/RNS in a controlled manner. We investigated how iNOS/(NO)-N-center dot modulates the tumor response to oxidative stress by involving the NF-kappa B and Nrf2 molecular pathways. We found that low levels of iNOS induce the development of a more aggressive tumor population, leading to survival, recurrence and resistance. By contrast, high levels of iNOS/(NO)-N-center dot sensitize tumor cells to oxidative treatment, causing cell growth arrest. Our analysis showed that NF-kappa B and Nrf2, which are activated in response to oxidative stress, communicate with each other through RKIP. For this critical role, RKIP could be an interesting target for anticancer drugs. Our study provides insight into the complex signaling response of cancer cells to oxidative treatments as well as new possibilities for the rational design of new therapeutic strategies.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据