4.8 Article

Autophagy inhibition rescues structural and functional defects caused by the loss of mitochondrial chaperone Hsc70-5 in Drosophila

期刊

AUTOPHAGY
卷 17, 期 10, 页码 3160-3174

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS INC
DOI: 10.1080/15548627.2020.1871211

关键词

Atg1; Hsc70-5; microtubule; mitochondria; mitophagy; rapamycin; synapse

资金

  1. Fritz Thyssen Foundation [10.12.1.192]
  2. Parkinson's UK [H1201]
  3. Hertie Foundation
  4. Chica and Heinz Schaller Foundation
  5. Max Planck Society

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The loss of the mitochondrial chaperone Hsc70-5 in Drosophila models led to synaptic dysfunction, resulting in pathological alterations similar to Parkinson's disease. Adult flies exhibited ATP depletion, altered body posture, and increased susceptibility to heat-induced paralysis, which could be suppressed by knocking down certain proteins.
We investigated in larval and adult Drosophila models whether loss of the mitochondrial chaperone Hsc70-5 is sufficient to cause pathological alterations commonly observed in Parkinson disease. At affected larval neuromuscular junctions, no effects on terminal size, bouton size or number, synapse size, or number were observed, suggesting that we studied an early stage of pathogenesis. At this stage, we noted a loss of synaptic vesicle proteins and active zone components, delayed synapse maturation, reduced evoked and spontaneous excitatory junctional potentials, increased synaptic fatigue, and cytoskeleton rearrangements. The adult model displayed ATP depletion, altered body posture, and susceptibility to heat-induced paralysis. Adult phenotypes could be suppressed by knockdown of dj-1 beta, Lrrk, DCTN2-p50, DCTN1-p150, Atg1, Atg101, Atg5, Atg7, and Atg12. The knockdown of components of the macroautophagy/autophagy machinery or overexpression of human HSPA9 broadly rescued larval and adult phenotypes, while disease-associated HSPA9 variants did not. Overexpression of Pink1 or promotion of autophagy exacerbated defects.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据