Clinical fracture incidence of rotary and reciprocating NiTi files: A systematic review and meta-regression

This systematic review was registered in PROSPERO (CRD42017075917) and aimed to investigate whether the available clinical evidence supports the hypothesis that reciprocating motion results in a lower incidence of nickel-titanium files fracture compared to continuous rotation. Clinical studies that reported the incidence of fracture of engine-driven nickel-titanium files were included. The main exposure was the kinematics, and the primary outcome was the incidence of files fracture. The overall incidence of files fracture was 2.27%, with a trend for higher incidence with rotary motion (2.43%) than with reciprocating (1.0%), though without significant differences. Multiple meta-regression models revealed that the use of nickel-titanium files in more than four teeth and less proficient operators were associated with a higher incidence of file fracture. There was no difference in the clinical incidence of fracture of nickel-titanium instruments between reciprocating and rotary motions; however, other factors were identified.

Automated summary

This systematic review investigated the relationship between the fracture rate of nickel-titanium files and different motion modes, finding no significant difference in the clinical fracture rate of nickel-titanium instruments between reciprocating and rotary motions, but identifying other factors that impact fracture rates.