4.6 Article

Probing the internal magnetism of stars using asymptotic magneto-asteroseismology

期刊

ASTRONOMY & ASTROPHYSICS
卷 647, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

EDP SCIENCES S A
DOI: 10.1051/0004-6361/202039180

关键词

asteroseismology; waves; stars: magnetic field; stars: oscillations; methods: analytical

资金

  1. European Research Council through ERC grant [SPIRE 647383]
  2. Astrophysics Division at CEA
  3. Ramon y Cajal fellowship [RYC-2015-17697]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Our knowledge of stellar dynamics has significantly improved with the advent of high-quality photometric observations from space-based asteroseismology and ground-based high-precision spectropolarimetry. However, new methods are needed to probe the deep magnetic fields in stars. We aim to provide seismic diagnoses that allow us to investigate the internal magnetism of stars, focusing on low-frequency gravity modes and high-frequency acoustic modes.
Context. Our knowledge of the dynamics of stars has undergone a revolution through the simultaneous large amount of high-quality photometric observations collected by space-based asteroseismology and ground-based high-precision spectropolarimetry. They allowed us to probe the internal rotation of stars and their surface magnetism in the whole Hertzsprung-Russell diagram. However, new methods should still be developed to probe the deep magnetic fields in these stars.Aims. Our goal is to provide seismic diagnoses that allow us to probe the internal magnetism of stars.Methods. We focused on asymptotic low-frequency gravity modes and high-frequency acoustic modes. Using a first-order perturbative theory, we derived magnetic splittings of their frequencies as explicit functions of stellar parameters.Results. As in the case of rotation, we show that asymptotic gravity and acoustic modes can allow us to probe the different components of the magnetic field in the cavities in which they propagate. This again demonstrates the high potential of using mixed-modes when this is possible.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据