4.6 Article

The atmosphere of HD 209458b seen with ESPRESSO No detectable planetary absorptions at high resolution

期刊

ASTRONOMY & ASTROPHYSICS
卷 647, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

EDP SCIENCES S A
DOI: 10.1051/0004-6361/202039539

关键词

planets and satellites: individual: HD 209458b; planets and satellites: atmospheres; methods: observational; techniques: spectroscopic

资金

  1. Spanish Ministry of Science, Innovation and Universities [ESP2016-80435-C2-2-R, ESP2017-87143-R, AYA2017-86389-P, AYA2016-79425-C3-2-P, PID2019-109522GB-C51]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [42075122]
  3. Natural Science Foundation of Jiangsu Province [BK20190110]
  4. DFG [RE 1664/16-1, SPP 1992]
  5. European Research Council (ERC) under the European Union's Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme [724427]
  6. FCT through Investigador FCT [IF/00852/2015, PTDC/FIS-OUT/29048/2017, IF/00650/2015/CP1273/CT0001]
  7. FCT - Fundacao para a Ciencia e a Tecnologia
  8. FEDER through COMPETE2020 - Programa Operacional Competitividade e Internacionalizacao [UID/FIS/04434/2019, UIDB/04434/2020, UIDP/04434/2020, PTDC/FIS-AST/32113/2017, POCI-01-0145-FEDER-032113, PTDC/FIS-AST/28953/2017, POCI-01-0145-FEDER-028953, PTDC/FIS-AST/28987/2017, POCI-01-0145-FEDER-028987]
  9. POPH/FSE (EC)
  10. FCT [DL 57/2016/CP1364/CT0004]
  11. Spanish State Research Agency (AEI) [ESP2017-87676-C5-1-R]
  12. Unidad de Excelencia Maria de Maeztu-Centro de Astrobiologia (INTA-CSIC) [MDM-2017-0737]
  13. Italian Ministry of Education, University, and Research with PRIN [201278X4FL]
  14. Progetti Premiali funding scheme
  15. Swiss National Science Foundation (SNSF)
  16. ESPRESSO through the SNSF [140649, 152721, 166227, 184618]
  17. Spanish Ministry of Science and Innovation (MICINN) [RYC-2013-14875]
  18. Spanish MICINN [AYA2017-86389-P]
  19. Swiss National Science Foundation
  20. SNSF
  21. SNSF's FLARE Programme

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study used high-resolution ESPRESSO spectrograph to observe two transits of the gas giant HD 209458b, finding features in the planetary transmission spectrum at wavelengths corresponding to strong absorption lines in the parent star. They did not detect any planetary absorption, including previously reported NaI, in the atmosphere of HD 209458b. The high signal-to-noise ratio in the transmission spectrum allows for comparisons of different one-dimensional stellar atmospheric models.
We observed two transits of the iconic gas giant HD 209458b between 380 and 780 nm, using the high-resolution ESPRESSO spectrograph. The derived planetary transmission spectrum exhibits features at all wavelengths where the parent star shows strong absorption lines, for example, NaI, MgI, FeI, FeII, CaI, VI, H alpha, and KI. We interpreted these features as the signature of the deformation of the stellar line profiles due to the Rossiter-McLaughlin effect, combined with the centre-to-limb effects on the stellar surface, which is in agreement with similar reports recently presented in the literature. We also searched for species that might be present in the planetary atmosphere but not in the stellar spectra, such as TiO and VO, and obtained a negative result. Thus, we find no evidence of any planetary absorption, including previously reported NaI, in the atmosphere of HD 209458b. The high signal-to-noise ratio in the transmission spectrum (similar to 1700 at 590 nm) allows us to compare the modelled deformation of the stellar lines in assuming different one-dimensional stellar atmospheric models. We conclude that the differences among various models and observations remain within the precision limits of the data. However, the transmission light curves are better explained when the centre-to-limb variation is not included in the computation and only the Rossiter-McLaughlin deformation is considered. This demonstrates that ESPRESSO is currently the best facility for spatially resolving the stellar surface spectrum in the optical range using transit observations and carrying out empirical validations of stellar models.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据