4.7 Article

Bothrops lanceolatus snake (Fer-de-lance) venom triggers inflammatory mediators' storm in human blood

期刊

ARCHIVES OF TOXICOLOGY
卷 95, 期 3, 页码 1129-1138

出版社

SPRINGER HEIDELBERG
DOI: 10.1007/s00204-020-02959-0

关键词

Bothrops lanceolatus venom; Systemic inflammation; Complement activation; Lipid mediators; Interleukins; Chemokines

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study investigated the systemic events in human whole-blood model induced by Bothrops lanceolatus venom, revealing a strong inflammatory reaction characterized by complement activation and release of lipid mediators that may favor thrombi formation.
Systemic increased inflammatory mediators' levels are a hallmark in a plethora of pathological conditions, including thrombotic diseases as the envenomation by Bothrops lanceolatus snake. Multiple organ infarctions, which are not prevented by anticoagulant therapy, are the main cause of death on this envenomation. However, the potential mechanisms involved in these systemic reactions are underexplored. This study aimed to explore the potential systemic events which could contribute to thrombotic reactions on the envenomation by B. lanceolatus in an ex vivo human whole-blood model. B. lanceolatus venom elicited an inflammatory reaction, which was characterized by a strong complement activation, since we detected high C3a, C4a and C5a anaphylatoxins levels. Besides, the venom promoted soluble Terminal Complement Complex (sTCC) assembly. Complement activation was accompanied by intense lipid mediators' release, which included LTB4, PGE(2) and TXB2. In addition, in the blood exposed to B. lanceolatus venom, we detected IL-1 beta, IL-6 and TNF-alpha interleukins production. Chemokines, including CCL2, CCL5 and CXCL8 were upregulated in the venom presence. These outcomes show that B. lanceolatus venom causes a strong inflammatory reaction in the blood favoring a potential setting to thrombi formation. Thus, inhibiting inflammatory mediators or their receptors may help in the envenomed patients' management.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据