期刊
ARCHIVES OF ORTHOPAEDIC AND TRAUMA SURGERY
卷 142, 期 6, 页码 987-996出版社
SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00402-020-03707-w
关键词
Osteoarthritis; Thumb; Trapeziectomy (T); Trapeziectomy with ligament reconstruction; Tendon interposition (T plus LRTI)
This study systematically analyzed the effects of simple trapeziectomy versus trapeziectomy with ligament reconstruction and tendon interposition in patients with trapeziometacarpal osteoarthritis. Results showed that while trapeziectomy with ligament reconstruction and tendon interposition had better grip and tip pinch strength outcomes, there was no significant difference in key pinch strength, pain relief, and disabilities of the arm, shoulder, and hand questionnaire scores. Additionally, trapeziectomy with ligament reconstruction and tendon interposition had more iatrogenic injuries, more short-term postoperative complications, and higher surgical costs.
Background The optimal management of trapeziometacarpal osteoarthritis remains controversial. This systematic review and meta-analysis assessed the subjective and objective outcomes and complications of simple trapeziectomy (T) versus trapeziectomy with ligament reconstruction and tendon interposition (T + LRTI). Methods The PubMed, Embase, Web of science, and Cochrane electronic databases were searched from inception to Aug 31, 2020. Key words included osteoarthrosis, carpometacarpal joint, and trapeziectomy. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and controlled clinical trials (CCTs) including patients treated for trapeziometacarpal osteoarthritis were included. The subjective outcomes (visual analog scale [VAS] and disabilities of the arm, shoulder, and hand questionnaire scores), objective outcomes (grip strength, tip, and key pinch strength) and complications were extracted. The methodological quality of each was assessed independently. Meta-analysis was performed for comparative trials. The protocol for this meta-analysis is available in PROSPERO (CRD42020195752). Results From the 8 included studies (7 RCTs, 1 CCT), 656 cases were divided into T (n = 325) and T + LRTI (n = 331) groups. Compared with the T group, grip and tip pinch strength was better in the T + LRTI group (SMD = - 2.74, 95% confidence interval (CI) (- 3.46 to - 2.02), P < 0.00001) and (SMD = - 0.21, 95% CI (- 0.34 to - 0.08), P = 0.002), respectively, but there were significantly more complications 3 months after operation in the T + LRTI group (RR = 0.50, 95% CI (0.31 to 0.80), P = 0.004). The VAS score (SMD = 0.33, 95% CI (- 0.39 to 1.04), P = 0.37), DASH (SMD = - 1.86, 95% CI (- 7.59 to 3.87), P = 0.52), key pinch strength (SMD = - 0.13, 95% CI (- 0.28 to 0.01), P = 0.07), and incidence of complications 1 year after operation (RR = 0.83, 95% CI (0.53-1.29), P = 0.41) were not significantly different between the two groups. Conclusion While the T + LRTI group demonstrated a better effect in grip and tip pinch strength at the one-year follow-up, there was no statistical difference in key pinch strength, pain relief, and DASH. Furthermore, T + LRTI has more latrogenic injury, more short-term postoperative complications, and higher surgical costs. Considered comprehensively, if there is no special strength requirement, we recommend simple trapeziectomy.
作者
我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。
推荐
暂无数据