4.5 Article

Antioxidant effect of Resveratrol: Change in MAPK cell signaling pathway during the aging process

期刊

出版社

ELSEVIER IRELAND LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.archger.2020.104266

关键词

Aging; Resveratrol; PKA; AkT/PKB; MAPK

资金

  1. Fundacao de Amparo Pesquisa do Estado de Minas Gerais [FAPEMIG -APQ-02574-14]
  2. Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Cientifico e Tecnologico (CNPq)
  3. Coordenacao de Aperfeicoamento de Pessoal de Nivel superior (CAPES)
  4. Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais (PRPq/UFMG)
  5. In Vitro Cells Toxicological Research Laboratory (IVC)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Aging is associated with an increase in ROS levels, and resveratrol can reduce ROS levels in both age groups, with greater efficiency observed in the middle-aged group. Inhibiting PKA, Akt/PKB, and MAPK signaling pathways can alter the antioxidant effects of resveratrol and change the signaling pattern of the MAPK pathway during the aging process.
Aging is characterized by a progressive loss of physiological integrity. One common denominator is the increase of reactive oxygen species (ROS) caused by inhibition of important antioxidant pathways. Resveratrol is a polyphenol known for its potent antioxidant activity. However, antioxidant pathways activated by them change with aging. The objective of our study was to verify the antioxidant effect of resveratrol in an oxidative stress environment in Human Mononuclear Cells (PBMC) from donors with different ages. Resveratrol (5 mu M), a stimulus with H2O2 (0,64 % v/v) in addition to inhibitors of PKA, AkT/PKB and MAPK signaling pathways were used in chemiluminescence assay. An incresed basal production of ROS was observed in the elderly than in the middle-aged group. Resveratrol was able to reduce ROS in both groups, but with greater efficiency in the middle-aged group. By inhibiting PKA, Akt/PKB and MAPK signaling pathways we observed that resveratrol presented an altered performance in the aging process, changing signaling pattern of MAPK pathway.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据