4.4 Review

What are the highest yielding search strategy terms for systematic reviews in atopic dermatitis? A systematic review

期刊

ARCHIVES OF DERMATOLOGICAL RESEARCH
卷 313, 期 9, 页码 737-750

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00403-020-02165-z

关键词

Atopic dermatitis; Eczema; Evidence-based medicine; Neurodermatitis; Meta-analysis

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study found that search strategies for systematic reviews (SR) of atopic dermatitis (AD) were diverse, with varying numbers of search terms leading to different hit rates.
The impact of search strategies on systematic reviews (SR) of atopic dermatitis (AD) is unknown. The purpose of this review was to evaluate search strategies used in SR of AD and their impact on the frequency of manuscripts identified. MEDLINE and EMBASE were searched for SR related to AD. Simulations were performed by running combinations of search terms in MEDLINE and EMBASE. Overall, 250 SR met inclusion criteria, of which 225 specified search strategies. SR using 5-6 terms (20.0% to 12.1%) or >= 7 (40.0% to 18.8%) terms decreased, whereas SR using 3-4 terms numerically increased (18.8% to 30.2%) and 1-2 terms remained similar (37.5% to 38.9%) from 1999-2009 to 2015-2019. The most commonly searched terms were atopic dermatitis (n = 166), followed by eczema (n = 156), dermatitis atopic' (n = 81), atopic eczema (n = 74), neurodermatitis (n = 59), Besniers prurigo (n = 29), infantile eczema (n = 27), and childhood eczema (n = 19). Simulations revealed that eczema and atopic dermatitis yielded the most hits. The number of search terms that maximized hits in MEDLINE and EMBASE was 5 and 4, respectively. Search strategies for AD were heterogeneous, with high proportions of search strategies providing few search hits. Future studies should use standardized and optimized search terms.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据