4.5 Article

New indomethacin analogs as selective COX-2 inhibitors: Synthesis, COX-1/2 inhibitory activity, anti-inflammatory, ulcerogenicity, histopathological, and docking studies

期刊

ARCHIV DER PHARMAZIE
卷 354, 期 4, 页码 -

出版社

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/ardp.202000328

关键词

anti‐ inflammatory activity; COX‐ 1; COX‐ 2; histopathology; indomethacin

向作者/读者索取更多资源

New indomethacin analogs were synthesized to improve selectivity and reduce ulcer liability. The compounds showed higher potency and selectivity against COX-2 compared to celecoxib, with some analogs demonstrating good anti-inflammatory activity and safety profiles. Compound 5 emerged as a promising anti-inflammatory lead compound with potential for further development.
New indomethacin analogs 4a-g, 5, 6, 8a, and 8b were synthesized to overcome the nonselectivity and ulcer liability of indomethacin. All newly synthesized compounds were more potent against cyclooxygenase 2 (COX-2; IC50 value range: 0.09-0.4 mu\M) as compared with celecoxib (IC50 = 0.89 mu\M). Compounds 4a, 4b, 4d, 5, and 6 showed the highest COX-2 selectivity index (SI range = 4.07-6.33) as compared with indomethacin (SI = 1.14) and celecoxib (SI = 3.52). Additionally, 4a, 4b, 4d, 5, and 7 showed good anti-inflammatory activity with edema inhibition (79.36-88.8%), relative to celecoxib (78.96%) and indomethacin (90.43%), after 5 h. Also, ulcerogenic effects and histopathological examination were assessed for the most potent analogs, 4b, 4d, 5, and 6, to determine their safety. The results can shed light on indomethacin analog 5 as a remarkable anti-inflammatory lead compound with a good safety profile (ulcer index = 10.62) close to the nonulcerogenic drug celecoxib (ulcer index = 10.53) and better than indomethacin (ulcer index = 18.50). Docking studies were performed in the COX-2 active site for the most active compounds, to test their selectivity and to confirm their mechanism of action.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据