4.1 Article

Evaluation of Quantitative XRF Analysis Applied to Determine Cobalt Sources in Chinese Blue-and-White Porcelain

期刊

ARCHAEOMETRY
卷 63, 期 1, 页码 194-203

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/arcm.12637

关键词

blue‐ and‐ white porcelain; cobalt; EDS; XRF

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A method was developed in the 1950s in Oxford to differentiate cobalt sources for Chinese blue-and-white porcelain using the ratios between MnO, Fe2O3, and CoO. Analysis of six blue-and-white porcelain sherds from the Luomaqiao kiln was conducted using XRF on the glaze and SEM-EDS in cross-section, revealing different ratios between MnO, Fe2O3, and CoO. The limitations of major and minor quantitative analyses for distinguishing cobalt sources are discussed.
A method using the ratios between MnO, Fe2O3 and CoO to differentiate the cobalt sources for Chinese blue-and-white porcelain was developed in Oxford in the 1950s using X-ray fluorescence (XRF) analysis directly on the glaze. In this paper, six blue-and-white porcelain sherds from the Luomaqiao kiln were analysed by XRF on the glaze and by scanning electron microscopy with energy-dispersive spectrometry (SEM-EDS) in cross-section. The ratios between MnO, Fe2O3 and CoO calculated by quantitative XRF and EDS analyses are different. The analysis depths for MnO, Fe2O3 and CoO are < 60 mu m by XRF analysis. However, the average glaze thickness of samples is > 400 mu m, and the MnO, Fe2O3 and CoO mainly remain in the lower layer of the glaze, which is beyond the analysis depths of XRF analysis. The limitations of major and minor quantitative analyses for differentiating cobalt sources are discussed.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.1
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据