4.7 Article

Effect of environmentally relevant concentrations of potentially toxic microplastic on coastal copepods

期刊

AQUATIC TOXICOLOGY
卷 230, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.aquatox.2020.105713

关键词

Microplastic; Tire wear particles; Acartia tonsa; Temora longicornis; Feeding; Reproduction

资金

  1. Velux Foundations
  2. H2020 CLAIM project (Cleaning Litter by developing and Applying Innovative Methods in European seas) [774586]
  3. H2020 Societal Challenges Programme [774586] Funding Source: H2020 Societal Challenges Programme

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study found that at environmentally relevant concentrations, the tire wear particles (TWP) currently measured in the ocean environment are unlikely to pose a threat to common coastal copepods. However, when the TWP concentration exceeds MP concentrations in coastal waters by more than 100 times, the type, concentration, food concentration, and feeding mode of copepods interact to influence feeding and pellet production.
Tire wear particles (TWP) are both abundant and potentially toxic types of microplastic (MP) in the coastal ocean. We tested the effects of TWP type (new tires, old tires, rubber granules from artificial turfs) and concentration (10-10,000 TWP L-1) on feeding, reproduction and fecal pellet production of two common coastal copepods at high (400 mu g C L-1) and low (40 mu g C L-1) food concentration consisting of a cryptophyte Rhodomonas sp. We did not observe any effect of TWP on copepods at environmentally relevant concentrations of <10 TWP L-1. At TWP concentrations that were >100 times higher than the MP concentrations measured in coastal waters, food concentration, copepod feeding mode, TWP concentration and TWP type interacted to influence copepod feeding and pellet production, while reproduction was unaffected. Our results suggest that TWP at the current measured concentrations in the ocean environment is not likely to be a threat to the common coastal copepods.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据